The B.C. government will limit the number of “adversarial experts” who can testify in auto injury claims, Attorney General David Eby announced Monday, in an attempt to stem the $1-billion-a-year losses at the Insurance Corp. of B.C.

“The current system permits unlimited use of adversarial experts and expert reports by both sides of litigation, creating unsustainable costs and unacceptable delays,” Eby said, before detailing reforms to stop the practice.

Effective immediately, people injured in car crashes will be able to use one expert and report for fast-track claims under $100,000 and up to three experts and reports for all other claims. Expert reports typically include statements from medical experts and can address wage loss, future wage loss and future medical care.

The government is also considering making this rule applicable to all personal injury claims as of Feb. 1, 2020.

Changes to the B.C. Supreme Court Civil Rules Regulation could save “in excess of $400 million,” Eby said, by encouraging earlier settlements and reducing the costs of settling vehicle injury claims. He said those savings depend on how lawyers and judges respond to the changes.

Judges will have the power to permit additional court-appointed or joint experts, thus limiting the government’s cap.

The Trial Lawyers Association of B.C. said in a statement it is concerned “that the attorney general, who is responsible for the administration of justice for all British Columbians, is forcing such severe restrictions on a victim’s right to prosecute her or his claim to the sole benefit of one party, ICBC.”

READ  Banking regulator defends stress test, open to change when warranted, Reports

Eby is forcing the changes “unilaterally,” the association said, without public debate in the legislature and despite protests from the independent Rules Committee, which is comprised of B.C. Supreme Court justices and senior lawyers, including lawyers who do defence work for ICBC.

“Time and again this government seems to favour ICBC’s financial interests over the legal rights of British Columbians, and this rush to pass restrictions on how victims of negligence must prove their cases at law is the most recent illustration of making car accident victims pay for reckless driving,” the association said.

Defence lawyer Michael Mulligan said the number of experts used in auto injury claims would go down if ICBC abandons adversarial bargaining positions, which, he argues, includes lowball settlements, leading to years of back and forth offers and counter offers. ICBC has a pattern of hiring its own medical experts who claim the victim is not as injured as they say, thus forcing the plaintiff to seek a different medical opinion, Mulligan said.

READ  The Thriller of the New Boeing Jet That Plunged Into the Sea, Killing 189

However, last week, lawyers for the Ministry of the Attorney General said despite public perception, ICBC isn’t lowballing claimants.

Eby acknowleged that both ICBC and crash victims are “operating within a broken system” and that “excesses” have taken place on both sides. He said he has no doubt that some lawyers will be concerned about the caps on experts, and “we expect they will be subject to multiple court challenges.”

He said similar changes in other provinces have survived legal challenges. Alberta and Ontario, for example, limit the number of experts in motor-vehicle injury claims.

“We hope that this change in limiting adversarial experts will encourage greater use of more neutral, jointly-approved, jointly-appointed independent experts to help the courts determine the value of injury claims,” Eby said. “And this overtime will shift the culture of the use of experts in our justice system.”

The B.C. Liberals said in a statement that “it’s time to stop defending the 46-year-old state-run monopoly and start working on solutions to find the best insurance system that actually saves money for British Columbians.”

Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson has called for an overhaul of the public auto insurance system in B.C. and criticized the NDP for changes that have led to rate increases.

READ  EpiPens may run out in August: Well being Canada

ICBC’s third quarter financial report released last week showed the corporation had a net loss of $860 million in the first nine months of its fiscal year, putting it on track to lose $1.18 billion for the full year.

This was largely blamed on prolonged legal battles with people injured in crashes who are demanding higher settlements, Eby said.

ICBC reported that the average cost of litigated injury claims jumped by 20 per cent to $121,826 in 2018 from $101,920 in 2017. ICBC is also paying 21 per cent more for medical experts, a cost which in most cases is covered by the public insurer.

A review of 1,200 injury files over $100,000 found that the injured person’s lawyer presented an average of six medical experts, many with overlapping skills, ICBC said.

The new rules will not apply to claims in which expert reports have already been commissioned, Eby said.

The cap on experts follows the lead of Australia and the United Kingdom, which “have tackled this problem very aggressively,” Eby said. In the U.K., personal injury lawsuits can include one joint expert with the permission of a judge and in Australia, no experts can be used unless explicitly permitted by a judge.

[email protected]

© Copyright Times Colonist


https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/icbc-province-to-limit-adversarial-experts-in-auto-injury-claims-1.23630209

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here